Information about the article

Article type:
Original article

Index UDK: 101:1 : 316.614

Year, Volume, Number:
2024, Vol. 12, № 3 (47)

Pages: 142-154

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT AS A SPACE FOR DIALOGUEN

German M. Kirillov
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Social Communications, Penza State University, 40 Krasnaya street, Penza, 440026, Russia, gekir10@mail.ru

EDN: WFKHKN
DOI: 10.21685/2307-9525-2024-12-3-14

Category: SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

For citation:
Kirillov G.M. Information and communication environment as a space for dialogue. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal "Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo" = Electronic scientific journal "Science. Society. State". 2024;12(3):142–154. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21685/2307-9525-2024-12-3-14

...................................

Received: 30.05.2024

Accepted: 30.07.2024
.......................................

Open access

Abstract
Background. The scope of the study is the modern information and communication environment as a space of dialogue. The author focuses on the influence of artificial intelligence on communication. The aim is to find out whether artificial intelligence is capable of being a full-fledged partner of a person in communication or whether it will have a negative impact on his/her communication capabilities, as well as whether dialogue is preserved as an element of classical culture in the context of total mediatization and predominance of mass communication. Materials and methods. The methodological position of the author is to consider the interaction of a human as a biosocial being and a carrier of consciousness on the one hand and artificial intelligence on the other – in a phenomenological perspective. Scientific literature and online information sources concerning various aspects of the influence of artificial intelligence on both an individual and modern society as a whole are analyzed. Results. Artificial intelligence has already become an important human assistant and can replace it in hard routine work, but it is not capable of becoming a full participant in the dialogue. Meanwhile, dialogue is critically important for the formation of such fundamental properties of consciousness as self-awareness and reflection in an individual. Nevertheless, artificial intelligence is able to change the natural environment of human communication, which can have ambiguous consequences. Conclusions. The current level of development of artificial intelligence makes significant changes in the aspects of communication, in particular, in its composition. Transformations of this order require the creation of a theoretical basis for human–artificial intelligence–human communication. Artificial intelligence is able to actively influence people’s consciousness. The integrity of consciousness may be at risk. In this regard, it is of paramount importance to preserve the natural environment of human interpersonal communication outside of which dialogue cannot exist. The ideas of M. Merleau-Ponty in the new ontology about the inseparable connection of human spirituality and corporeality become particularly relevant. In the perspective of the new ontology, the ecology of language assumes particular significance.

Keywords
“body without organs”, “organs without body”, artificial intelligence, dialogue, mediatization, communication, dualism

References
1. Merleau-PontyM. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. Per. s fr. pod red. I.S. Vdovinoy, S.L. Fokina = Phenomenology of perception. Translated from French and edited by I.S. Vdovina, S.L. Fokin. Saint Petersburg: Yuventa: Nauka, 1999:608. (In Russ.)
2. Deleuze Zh., Guattari F. Tysyacha plato. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya = Thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, 2010:872. (In Russ.)
3. Laing R.D. Raskolotoe «Ya»: ekzistentsialnoe issledovanie «normalnosti» i bezumiya. Fenomenologiya perezhivaniya i Rayskaya ptichka = Split self: Existential study of “normality” and madness. Phenomenology of experience and bird of paradise. Moscow: IOI, 2017:345. (In Russ.)
4. Plotinus. Shestaya Enneida. Traktaty VI–IX. Per. s drevnegrech. i poslesl. T.G. Sidasha = The Sixth Enneads. Works VI–IX. Translated from Ancient Greek and after-worded by T.G. Sidash. Saint Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko, 2005:416. (In Russ.)
5. Minsky M.L. The Society of Mind. New York: Simon&Schuster, 1986:339.
6. Ustyugova Yu.O. Transformation of the concept of “metanoia” in religious tradition. Idei i idealy = Ideas and Ideals. 2003;15(1–1):35–43. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17212/2075-0862-2023-15.1.1-35-43
7. Aristotle. O dushe = On the soul. Moscow: Neoclassic, 2022:416. (In Russ.)
8. Lotman Yu.M. Kultura i vzryv = Culture and explosion. Moscow: Progress: Gnozis, 1992:270. (In Russ.)
9. Dioptra, ili Dukhovnoe zertsalo. Sbornik dushepoleznykh poucheniy i blagogoveynykh razmyshleniy = Dioptra, or spiritual mirror. Collection of soul-saving teachings and reverent reflections. Moscow: Sibirskaya Blagozvonnitsa, 2018:576. (In Russ.)
10. Likhachev D.S. (eds.) Biblioteka literatury Drevney Rusi: v 20 t. T. 15: XVII vek = Library of literature of Ancient Rus: in 20 volumes. Vol. 15: XVII century. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2006:530. (In Russ.)
11. Tung B. Function of the shadow archetype in literature (“The True and False Monkey King” in Wu Cheng-en’s “Journey to the West,” H.K. Andersen’s “Shadow,” and N.V. Gogol’s “Nose”). Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika = Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Philology. Journalism. 2022;(3):52–57. (In Russ.)
12. Esenin S. Chernyy chelovek = The Black Man. Moscow: Eksmo, 2024:384. (In Russ.)
13. Bekhterev V.M. Mozg i razum: fiziologiya myshleniya = Brain and mind: Physiology of thinking. Moscow: AST, 2023:256. (In Russ.)
14. Husserl E. Krizis evropeyskikh nauk i transtsendental'naya fenomenologiya: vvedenie v fenomenologicheskuyu filosofiyu: monografiya. Per. s nem. D.V. Sklyadneva = Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: Introduction to phenomenological philosophy: Monograph. Translated from German by D.V. Sklyadneva. Saint Petersburg: Fond Universitet, 2004:399. (In Russ.)
15. Descartes R. Rassuzhdenie o metode = Discourse on the method. Moscow: Politicheskaya literatura, 1950:634. (In Russ.)
16. Metzinger T. Nauka o mozge i mif o svoem Ya. Tonnel ego = Brain science and myth of the self. The ego tunnel. Moscow: Litmir, 1987:67. (In Russ.)
17. Lem S. Nepobedimyy = Invincible. Moscow: AST: Neoclassic, 2024:224. (In Russ.)
18. Zinoviev A.A. Globalnyy cheloveynik: izbrannye proizvedeniya = Global anthill: Selected works. Moscow: Kanon, 2023:368. (In Russ.)
19. Merleau-PontyM. Vidimoe i nevidimoe = Visible and invisible. Minsk: Logvinov, 2006:400. (In Russ.)

Дата создания: 18.07.2024 18:44
Дата обновления: 03.09.2024 20:22